To refer to this article use this url: http://www.gjss.nl/vol02/nr02/a06
References
Barrow, J.D. (1998) Impossibility: The limits of science and the science of limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bateson, G. (1958 [1936]) Naven: A survey of the problems suggested by a composite Picture of the culture of a New Guinea tribe drawn from three points of view. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler.
Bateson, G. (1979) Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: E.P. Dutton.
Bateson, M.C. (1994 [1984]) With a daughter’s eye: A memoir of Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson. New York: Harper Perennial.
Benedict, R. (1946) The chrysanthemum and the sword: Patterns of Japanese culture. Cambridge: Riverside Press.
Boyer, P. (1999) ‘Human Cognition and Cultural Evolution.’ In: H.L. Moore (ed.) Anthropological theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brumann, C. (1999) ‘Writing for culture: Why a successful concept should not be discarded.’ Current Anthropology, 40 (1): pp. S1-S27.
Clifford, J. & G.E. Marcus (eds.) (1986) Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Condor, S. & C. Antaki (1997) ‘Social cognition and discourse.’ In: T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, Volume 1, Discourse as structure and process. London: Sage.
Curry, H.B., R. Feys & W. Craig (1958) Combinatory logic: Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dumont, L. (1958) Essais sur l’individualisme: Une perspective anthropologique sur l’ideologie moderne. Paris: Seuil.
Gil-White, F.J. (2001) ‘Are Ethnic Groups Biological “Species” to the Human Brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories.’ Current anthropology, 42: pp. 515-554.
Gödel, K. (1988 [1931]) ‘On formally undecidable propositions of “Principia Mathematica” and related systems I.’ In: S.G. Shanker (ed.) Gödel’s theorem in focus. London: Croom Helm.
Herskovits, M.J. (1972) Cultural relativism: Perspectives in cultural pluralism. New York: Random House.
Howarth, D. (2004) ‘Towards a Heideggerian social science: Heidegger, Kisiel and Weiner on the limits of anthropological discourse.’ Anthropological theory, 4: pp. 229-247.
Krajewski, S. (1981) ‘Antinomies.’ In: W. Marciszewski (ed.) Dictionary of logic as applied in the study of language. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Nagel, E. & J.R. Newman, (1959) Gödel’s proof. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Penrose, R. (1990 [1989]) De nieuwe geest van de keizer: Over computers, de menselijke geest en de natuurwetten. Amsterdam: Prometheus. Translated by J. den Bekker.
Rosaldo, R. (1986) ‘From the door of his tent: The fieldworker and the inquisitor.’ In: J. Clifford & G.E. Marcus (eds.) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Russell, B. & A.N. Whitehead (1910) Principia Mathematica: Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Samuels, R. (2000) ‘Massively modular minds: Evolutionary psychology and cognitive architecture.’ In: P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (eds.) Evolution and the human mind: Modularity, language and meta-cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schultz, R.A. (1980) ‘What could self-reflexiveness be? Or Goedel’s theorem goes to Hollywood and discovers that’s all done with mirrors.’ Semiotica, 30: pp. 135-152.
Shadid, W. & P.S. van Koningsveld (1995) De mythe van het islamitische gevaar: Hindernissen bij integratie. Kampen: Kok. Second print.
Shanker, S.G. (1988) ‘Wittgenstein’s remarks on the significance of Gödel’s theorem.’ In: S.G. Shanker (ed.) Gödel’s theorem in focus. London: Croom Helm.
Smullyan, R.M. (1992) Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van Baal, J. (1974) De agressie der gelijken. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1991) Racism and the press. London: Routledge.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2003) De Rasoel-Komrij Affaire. Amsterdam: Critics.
Van Oostendorp, M. (2003a) Je bent hoe je schrijft: Verraadt de stijl de auteur? http://www.onzetaal.nl/nieuws/auteursherkenning.html. Accessed 28 December 2005.
Van Oostendorp, M. (2003b) Je bent hoe je schrijft: Verraadt de stijl de auteur? http://www.vanoostendorp.nl/linguist/auteursherkenning.html. Accessed 28 December 2005.
Visser, A. (1989) ‘Semantics and the Liar Paradox.’ In: D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds.) Handbook of philosophical logic: Vol. IV. Dordrecht: Reidel.